Connect with us

METRO

I Refused My Daughter’s Request to Wear Her Late Mom’s Wedding Dress, Now I’m Facing Backlash from My Whole Family

Published

on

By

Adam, 42, wrote a touching letter about his personal battle. He is still in grief for his adored late wife and is at differences with his eldest daughter over her preferred wedding outfit. Adam’s late wife owned the gown in question, which is why he strongly opposes its usage in his daughter’s wedding ceremony. Regardless of the truth of his position, Adam risks rejection from his family, leading to his suffering.

Adam’s wife passed away suddenly, leaving him in a state of ongoing grief.

Adam opened his letter by remembering his late wife, Emily, whom he had known since their school days. Their path from sweethearts to spouses was cherished, culminating in a wedding day that he considers the most dazzling memory of his life. Adam clearly remembered Emily’s elegance in her wedding gown, an emotional moment that moved him to tears when he saw it for the first time…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

Adam revealed, “Emily passed away last year. Her ԃҽαƚԋ was sudden, she just fell down to the ground on the street and passed away immediately. The ambulance couldn’t do anything but confirm her passing. To me, her passing was almost the end of my life. I am still in my early grief, and I haven’t even fully realized that Emily’s gone forever now.”

The dad explained, “We have three daughters; the eldest, Gerry, recently got engaged. She is getting married shortly, which should be a pleasant event in our family, but in our case, it has started an everlasting quarrel between me and her.”

Adam’s daughter has expressed her desire to wear her late mother’s dress for her own wedding ceremony.

Adam said, “Just the other day, Gerry came to me and expressed her desire to wear Emily’s bridal gown for her wedding. I quickly dissuaded her, explaining why it would be inappropriate. Aside from my unwillingness to allow anyone, especially my daughter, near that cherished outfit, I have another layer of protectiveness for my late wife’s stuff.”

Adam explained, “My late wife’s wedding dress had a unique narrative. Emily had fashioned it herself, by hand. She had worked on it for two months and refused to accept aid from anyone, including her grandma, whom she adored.”

He wrote, “While Emily and I were just dating, she became pregnant. We were overjoyed with the news; despite the fact that we were both young and had a long life ahead of us, neither of us saw children as a hindrance. We were really ecstatic and on cloud nine. We told our parents, and they were very supportive. They promised to help us with the baby, and we were confident that we would have a lovely life as newlyweds and parents. We had already decided on a name for the baby: Emily, after her mother. But then, tragedy struck, and Emily gave birth to a girl who passed away in the hospital two hours later.”

The wedding dress held profound significance for Adam and his late wife.

READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Adam continued to say, “Emily insisted that we honor our baby’s memory, so she asked medical workers to make our daughter’s footprint on a piece of clay for us.” This lump of clay with a footprint was later placed in a tiny bag and sewed inside Emily’s bridal gown. This was the method to respect our infant daughter’s memory, and Emily insisted it was vital to her at the time.

The man revealed, “None of our daughters knew about this, because we had kept it a secret from them. When we had another conversation with Gerry about the dress, I forbade her to even touch it, let alone wear it during her wedding. I simply explained it to her that she can’t wear the dress because her mom wouldn’t want her to do it. Gerry instantly became furious, she started calling me names, saying that I’m a bad father and that I am gatekeeping my wife’s things.”

Adam told his daughter to dress differently. He explained, “I told her no again, and then I said I don’t mind, and she could wear some of her late mother’s jewels. However, she insisted on wearing the dress, accusing me of wrecking her wedding.”

The father said, “I’ve tried countless times to reason with her, presenting numerous alternatives to her absurd idea of wearing Emily’s dress.” I proposed buying a gorgeous designer gown, promised to cover the wedding expenditures, and even intended to give her exquisite jewelry on her big day. However, she refuses to explore these choices, so escalating tensions between us and among our family.”

Adam faces harsh judgment from many, and his family has turned their backs on him.

Adam goes on with his letter, saying, “Now, all of my daughters are against me, out of their solidarity with their sister. Even my parents are judging me, they say the dress is only a piece of fabric and there’s nothing to fight about with my own daughter. They insist that I must stop prohibiting my daughter from wearing her mom’s dress, and they say it will be an honor of her memory.”

Adam takes a tough stance for a reason. He expresses, “Emily held her wedding attire in high regard; it was something she would never let anyone touch. I don’t feel forced to tell Gerry about this, and I don’t believe my daughter should have to deal with this awful memories. She should appreciate my decision as it is. However, I find myself in a pickle: I’m expected to make a decision I can’t accept, and if I do, I risk losing my daughter’s trust. “What should I do?”

The post I Refused My Daughter’s Request to Wear Her Late Mom’s Wedding Dress, Now I’m Facing Backlash from My Whole Family appeared first on Timeless Life.

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

METRO

Guy Fawkes’ punishment was one of the most severe in English history – here’s what happens when a body is hung, drawn and quartered

Published

on

By

Fawkes and his co-conspirators were sentenced to hanging, drawing and quartering. Crispijn van de Passe the Elder/ Wikimedia Commons

After their infamous plot to destroy parliament was foiled, Guy Fawkes and his co-conspirators received one of the most severe judicial sentences in English history: hanging, drawing and quartering. According to the Treason Act 1351 , this punishment involved…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

Author

  • Michelle SpearProfessor of Anatomy, University of Bristol

That you be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution, where you shall be hanged by the neck and being alive cut down, your privy members shall be cut off and your bowels taken out and burned before you, your head severed from your body and your body divided into four quarters to be disposed of at the King’s pleasure.

This process aimed not only to inflict excruciating pain on the condemned, but to serve as a deterrent – demonstrating the fate of those who betrayed the Crown. While Fawkes reportedly jumped from the gallows – which meant he avoided the full extent of his punishment – his co-conspirators apparently weren’t so lucky.

By dissecting each stage of this medieval punishment from an anatomical perspective, we can understand the profound agony each of them endured.

Torture for confession

Before his public execution on January 31 1606, Fawkes was tortured to force a confession about his involvement in the “gunpowder plot”.

The Tower of London records confirm that King James I personally authorised “the gentler tortures first”. Accounts reveal that Fawkes was stretched on the rack – a device designed to slowly pull the limbs in opposite directions. This stretching inflicted severe trauma on the shoulders, elbows and hips, as well as the spine.

The forces exerted by the rack probably exceeded those required for joint or hip dislocation under normal conditions.

Substantive differences between Fawkes’ signatures on confessions between November 8 and shortly before his execution may indicate the amount of nerve and soft tissue damage sustained. It also illustrates how remarkable his final leap from the gallows was.

An engraving depicting a person being tortured on the rack.
The rack slowly pulled a prisoner’s limbs in opposite directions. Wellcome Collection/ Wikimedia Commons , CC BY-SA

Stage 1: hanging (partial strangulation)

After surviving the torture of the rack, Fawkes and his gang faced the next stage of their punishment: hanging. But this form of hanging only partially strangled the condemned – preserving their consciousness and prolonging their suffering.

Partial strangulation exerts extreme pressure on several critical neck structures. The hyoid bone , a small u-shaped structure above the larynx, is prone to bruising or fracture under compression .

Simultaneously, pressure on the carotid arteries restricts blood flow to the brain, while compression of the jugular veins causes pooling of blood in the head – probably resulting in visible haemorrhages in the eyes and face.

Because the larynx and trachea (both essential for airflow) are partially obstructed, this makes breathing laboured. Strain on the cervical spine and surrounding muscles in the neck can lead to tearing, muscle spasms or dislocation of the vertebra – causing severe pain. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Fawkes brought his agony to a premature end by leaping from the gallows. Accounts from the time tell us:

His body being weak with the torture and sickness, he was scarce able to go up the ladder – yet with much ado, by the help of the hangman, went high enough to break his neck by the fall.

This probably caused him to suffer a bilateral fracture of his second cervical vertebra, assisted by his own bodyweight – an injury known as the “hangman’s fracture” .

Stage 2: Drawing (disembowelment)

After enduring partial hanging, the victim would then be “drawn” – a process which involved disembowelling them while still alive. This act mainly targeted the organs of the abdominal cavity – including the intestines, liver and kidney, as well as major blood vessels such as the abdominal aorta.

The physiological response to disembowelment would have been immediate and severe. The abdominal cavity possesses a high concentration of pain receptors – particularly around the membranous lining of the abdomen . When punctured, these pain receptors would have sent intense pain signals to the brain, overwhelming the body’s capacity for pain management . Shock would soon follow due to the rapid drop in blood pressure caused by massive amounts of blood loss.

Stage 3: quartering (dismemberment)

Quartering was also supposed to be performed while the victim was still alive. Though no accounts exist detailing at what phase victims typically lost consciousness during execution, it’s highly unlikely many survived the shock of being drawn.

So, at this stage, publicity superseded punishment given the victim’s likely earlier demise. Limbs that were removed from criminals were preserved by boiling them with spices. These were then toured around the country to act as a deterrent for others.

Though accounts suggest Fawkes’s body parts were sent to “the four corners of the United Kingdom”, there is no specific record of what was sent where. However, his head was displayed in London .

Traitor’s punishment

The punishment of hanging, drawing and quartering was designed to be as anatomically devastating as it was psychologically terrifying. Each stage of the process exploited the vulnerabilities of the human body to create maximum pain and suffering, while also serving as a grim reminder of the consequences of treason.

This punishment also gives us an insight into how medieval justice systems used the body as a canvas for social and political messaging. Fawkes’s fate, though unimaginable today, exemplifies the extremes to which the state could, and would, go to maintain control, power and authority over its subjects.

The sentence of hanging, drawing and quartering was officially removed from English law as part of the Forfeiture Act of 1870 .

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

OPINION: 4 Children Who Were Sentenced to life imprisonment At A Young Age And what They Did

Published

on

By

There are many unusual things happening across the world. Children are charming and lovely, yet others are really dangerous and have been involved in a variety of illegal activities in society.

In this post, we’ll look at four children who were condemned to life in jail Please keep in mind that some of these children are now adults…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

1. Joshua Phillips:

Joshua Phillips stabbed his neighbor’s eight-year-old daughter and put the girl’s body under his bed at home. After eight days, his mother discovered the body.

Joshua Phillips was fourteen years old when he committed this act, according to reports, and he was sentenced to life in jail.

Take a look at how Joshua Phillips is now.

2. Eric Smith:

Eric Smith, according to sources, was condemned to life in jail many years ago. Eric Smith was just 13 years old when he hit a 4-year-old boy with a rock and killed him.

Following multiple conversations with Eric, he stated that he was bullied by several senior kids at his school and that he killed the youngster because he was irritated and upset. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

3. Lionel Tate:

Lionel Tate was one of the youngest people to get a life sentence.

According to sources, when he was 13 years old, Lionel Tate killed his neighbor’s six-year-old daughter.

Lionel Tate claimed he was boxing with the young girl.

4. Brian Lee Draper:

Brian Lee Draper was sentenced to life in prison in 2006 for murdering a classmate, according to reports.

The murder was committed by Brian Lee Draper and his friend Torey Adamcik, who was sixteen years old at the time.

Parents should always endeavor to teach their children how to be good children, as well as pray for them.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

Lady Caught Feeding Neighbor’s Baby With Faeces & Urine Speaks From Prison, Gives This Ugly Reason

Published

on

By

A woman named Stella Namwanje was arrested in Uganda for allegedly committing an atrocious act against her neighbor’s baby. Reports indicate that she was caught on video defecating and urinating on the infant before feeding him the waste. This shocking behavior has drawn widespread condemnation and raised serious concerns about the child’s welfare…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

The incident took place in the Binyonyi A area of the Nyendo-Mukungwe division. Local authorities acted swiftly after the disturbing footage circulated on social media, prompting community outrage. The police have since taken Namwanje into custody to investigate the circumstances surrounding her actions and ensure the safety of the child.

The case has sparked discussions about the need for stronger measures to protect vulnerable individuals, especially children, from abuse. It highlights the alarming reality of child torture and the psychological issues that may drive such behavior. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

As the investigation unfolds, the community is rallying to support the affected family and prevent similar incidents in the future. The legal proceedings against Namwanje will likely focus on the extent of her actions and the necessary repercussions for such a heinous crime.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!