Connect with us

IN-THE-NEWS

Meghan Markle’s secret letter to King Charles revealed, and his response left the Duchess’miserable’.

Published

on

By

In the United States, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have begun a new life. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex quit the royal family many years ago, but the aftermath has stunned them. In their shocking Oprah interview and Harry’s book Spare, Harry and Meghan leveled various accusations and personal attacks against the royal family, including questioning Archie’s skin tone before he was born.

Without a question, the royals’ relationship with the Sussexes has reached an all-time low. Harry was present at King Charles’ coronation, although little appears to have changed between him and William, for example. Amidst all of this, it is claimed that Charles made every attempt to encourage Meghan and was the only royal to contact her and Harry after the Oprah interview.

Unfortunately, Meghan revealed that she attempted suicide as a working royal, and Charles wrote her a letter about it. Meghan was not pleased with the then-prince’s response, and rumors said that it had a big impact on a critical decision.

Harry and Meghan’s past is extensive. After meeting at a tennis tournament in London in 2016, the couple began dating, and their romance swiftly grew. However, some of Meghan’s friends predicted that she would be unhappy with him before they married.

Meghan revealed in a 2019 ITV interview that some of her friends had even warned her against marrying Harry because of the expected media attention.

“I never thought this would be easy, but I thought it would be fair, and that’s the part that’s really hard to reconcile,” the Duchess continued. She went on, “I’ve been telling H—that’s what I call [Harry]—for a long time that simply surviving something is insufficient. That isn’t the purpose of existence. You must prosper and have happiness.

Harry and Meghan married in a magnificent ceremony at St. George’s Chapel on May 19, 2018.

It was clear at the time that Meghan had been accepted by the royal family. Especially King Charles, who treated the Duchess so kindly during the event despite the fact that her father was not invited.

King Charles accompanied Meghan down the aisle at her wedding.

According to royal biographer Robert Hardman, Charles inquired about Meghan’s desire to be led down the aisle by him. According to Hardman in Queen of Our Times: The Life of Elizabeth II, Charles received a speedy response, but it did not meet his expectations.

Meghan took the now-King off guard when she requested to meet her halfway down the aisle. She wanted to enter the chapel alone and make a spectacular impression.

The Prince of Wales offered to intercede, expressing his love for his future daughter-in-law and declaring that he would be delighted to accompany Meghan to the altar and up the aisle of St. George’s Chapel. One acquaintance stated that he was not fully prepared for the response, “Can we meet halfway?” Hardman wrote.

“This demonstrated that the woman making the grand entrance wasn’t a blushing bride, but rather a self-assured and self-reliant individual.”

In the 2018 BBC documentary Prince, Son, and Heir, Harry acknowledged his father’s readiness to accompany his bride to her wedding. At first, Harry claimed to have consulted his father about it, and Charles had immediately given his assent.

I believe he anticipated my request since he immediately responded, “Yes, of course, I’ll do whatever Meghan needs and I’m here to support you,” when I made it. Harry remembered.

WPA Pool and Getty Photos

Because he is our father, he will certainly be there for us, so for him, this is an excellent opportunity to step up and express his support.

Meghan Markle said that a “unnamed royal” commented on Archie’s skin tone.

Harry and Meghan began publicly assaulting the royal family a year after their departure, which was surprising given their wedding day.

Meanwhile, the Duchess revealed a number of surprising revelations during her interview with Oprah, including how an unnamed royal made a remark about Archie’s skin tone.

During the months I was pregnant, roughly around this time. Meghan Markle recalled: “So we have conversations and worries about how dark his skin might be when he’s born, in addition to the conversation that he won’t be given security or a title.”

Meghan believed that as a working royal, she had to endure a great deal of sexism, racism, and media harassment. Her mental health deteriorated, and as previously said, she felt abandoned by members of the royal family.

Meghan had enough of it to become suicidal.

“I just couldn’t see a way out of it. I used to sit awake at night thinking, “I don’t understand how all of this is being produced.” Again, I wasn’t noticing it, but when my mother or friends express it or phone me in tears, it’s almost worse because you feel like, “Meg, they’re not protecting you.” She said, “And I realized that everything was happening just because I was breathing.”

Given Harry’s level of anguish, I was embarrassed to reveal it to him. I was also really embarrassed to say it at the time. However, I was aware that if I remained silent, I would follow through on it. I simply did not want to live anymore. Meghan went on, “And that was a very real, very obvious, and very scary notion all the time.”

READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Meghan did not witness the coronation of King Charles.

And I remember how he just held me in his arms. I went to the institution and told them I needed to receive some help. “I need to go somewhere because I’ve never felt this way before,” I said. I was told that it wouldn’t benefit the institution and that I couldn’t do it.

The Sussexes’ connection with the royal family quickly deteriorated, and many members of The Firm were outraged by the allegations brought against them.

According to sources, Princess Eugenie is the only royal who has traveled to California to visit Harry, Meghan, and their two children, Archie and Lilibet. Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan have only returned to the UK on rare occasions; the Duchess returned only once, in 2022, to attend Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral.

One of the primary topics of discussion during King Charles’ coronation in Westminster Abbey last May was whether Harry and Meghan would attend or even be invited.

The king would eventually decide whether or not to welcome the two, despite the fact that they had lost the majority of the royal family’s trust at that moment.

Harry ultimately decided to attend his father’s coronation, while Meghan stayed in the United States to care for Archie and Lilibet.

Perhaps it is not surprising that Harry attended the coronation. But he left for the airport and returned to his wife shortly after the wedding. There are speculations that certain royals were relieved that Harry did not join them for the coronation lunch.

They even pictured Harry and Meghan sitting far back in Westminster Abbey, away from the rest of the family, if she showed up.

Meghan Markle wrote Charles a letter after her appearance on Oprah.

As previously announced, Meghan Markle remained in the United States to care for her two children. But, given that Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland, is known to help her with the children when things become stressful, is there another possible rationale for Meghan’s refusal to accompany her husband to the UK?

There is, according to a piece in The Telegraph from April of last year. Meghan elected to write a letter to Prince Charles, outlining her concerns about unconscious bias following the Oprah interview.

Later, King Charles, who was then a prince, chose to respond to Meghan by lamenting the family’s disputes, notably those between Harry and Meghan and the rest of The Firm.

Charles was also reported to be the only senior royal relative that contacted the Duchess after the Oprah interview.

The Telegraph article contained new material, including Meghan’s admission to Charles that her purpose was to discuss unconscious bias rather than accuse the royal family of racism.

There were reports that Meghan Markle wouldn’t attend the coronation. Rumor had it that the Duchess was furious that Charles had not addressed her concerns about unconscious bias in his letter, which was the real reason she had turned up today.

A spokesperson for Meghan Markle rejected any coronation speculations.

Later, a spokeswoman for Meghan dismissed the claims as “ridiculous.”

The Duchess of Sussex is enjoying her life in the present, unconcerned with letters she received two years ago or conversations she had four years before. Anything to the contrary is false and completely ludicrous. Meghan’s spokesman told People Magazine, “We encourage tabloid media and various royal correspondents to stop the exhausting circus that they alone are creating.”

In an ITV interview in early 2023, Harry decided to address the matter of alleged racism among the royal family, assuring the reporter that he did not believe they were.

Harry answered, “No.” “Is that what the British press said? Has Meghan ever stated that “they’re racists”?

“There is a distinction to be made between racism and unconscious bias. When your unconscious prejudice is recognized or brought to your attention as an individual, as opposed to an institution, you have the chance to develop and learn from it. Otherwise, racism is categorized as unconscious bias, he continued.

The post Meghan Markle’s secret letter to King Charles revealed, and his response left the Duchess’miserable’. appeared first on Timeless Life.

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

IN-THE-NEWS

China Secretly Fueling Putin’s War Machine Through Hidden Shell Companies, Expert Reveals –

Published

on

By

 

China is secretly helping Russia get weapons by using fake companies to hide the deals, according to an expert named Stefan Bejan from Watchdog Moldova. He says China plays a big part in making sure Russia keeps getting the arms it needs to continue its war in Ukraine. Instead of sending weapons directly, China uses other companies to cover up what’s really going on. These companies ship drones and other military equipment to Russia, helping them get around international sanctions meant to stop the war.

Bejan explained how the money and weapons move. It starts with Promsvyazbank, which is the main bank supporting Russia’s military. Money from this bank is sent through a payment platform called A7. A7 is partly owned by Ilan Shor, a businessman with strong ties to helping Russia avoid sanctions. After that, the money goes into accounts at Capital Bank of Central Asia. There, it is turned into other currencies like Chinese yuan or US dollars. Then, it flows through fake companies and is used to buy weapons from Chinese businesses.

Even though China, under President Xi Jinping, officially denies helping Russia, Bejan believes Chinese leaders know exactly what is happening. China is careful not to sell arms directly to Russia. Instead, it uses third-party companies to create a layer of distance, giving it “plausible deniability” — meaning it can claim it’s not involved if caught. This setup reflects the close relationship between Russia and China, which both countries have described as a “limitless friendship.”

Bejan also said China is careful because it doesn’t want to face “secondary sanctions” from Western countries. These sanctions could hurt China’s economy if it is seen as openly helping Russia. That’s why China makes it look like the weapon sales are just private business deals, not government support. Still, China is providing Russia with important help, including technology, economic aid, and, as these findings show, weapons.

The trick of using shell companies and intermediaries makes it very hard for Western countries to directly stop these deals. However, Bejan believes that regulators around the world will start paying closer attention. He expects more sanctions will come, especially targeting the banks and companies involved in Central Asia.

Bejan explained that these hidden financial operations are one of the reasons Russia can keep fighting in Ukraine. Even though sanctions have hurt Russia’s economy and military, these secret money and arms channels keep them going. He warned that unless these operations are shut down, the war could continue for a very long time. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

A key player in this scheme is Ilan Shor, who owns part of A7 and is currently living in Moscow. He is already under sanctions by the US, UK, and EU. Shor has strong connections with political leaders in both Russia and Moldova, making him an important figure in keeping these operations running smoothly — and he profits from them.

Beyond Russia’s war, these secret financial moves could also impact nearby countries like Moldova, which borders Ukraine. Bejan warned that some of the money moving through these networks could end up funding pro-Russian political campaigns in Moldova, which would create even more instability, especially with upcoming elections there.

In the bigger picture, Bejan said the arms shipments are just one part of a larger web of financial and political cooperation between Russia and China. As the war in Ukraine drags on, he stressed that the West must work harder to disrupt these secret deals to avoid further chaos.

His warning adds to growing fears about China’s true role in the Ukraine conflict. Although China claims it is neutral, its actions tell a different story. As Russia and China grow even closer, the world will have to watch their alliance carefully, especially to see how it might affect the war and global stability in the future.

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

IN-THE-NEWS

Leaked Video Exposes Russian Commander Forcing Soldiers into Fight to the Death in War Punishment Pit –

Published

on

By

 

A disturbing video has surfaced online, supposedly showing a Russian commander forcing two of his own soldiers to fight each other to the death. This happened after the soldiers refused to join the war in Ukraine. The shocking scene is believed to have taken place in the Donbas region, which is under Russian control. The footage, though not yet verified, has spread across Russian social media and has shocked many viewers.

The commander, known only by his nickname “Kama,” reportedly made the two men fight in what he called a “gladiator-style battle.” According to reports, he told them that whoever won the fight would be set free. Fellow officers from their military unit, the 114th Motorised Rifle Brigade, are said to have placed bets on who would survive. A witness claimed that one of the soldiers ended up killing the other by choking him with his bare hands.

Both of the men had apparently refused to follow orders to fight in the war, which is why they were punished. Russian sources call such soldiers “refuseniks.” It’s believed that soldiers who resist or try to escape their duties are being locked up in underground pits, known as “punishment pits” or “zindans.” This brutal punishment is said to be happening more often, especially in army units that have lost many men during battles in the Donetsk area.

People on Russian social media reacted with horror after watching the video. One person commented that while it’s better for Russian soldiers to fight each other than to harm Ukrainians, the situation is still extremely disturbing and shows just how brutal the Russian army has become. Another user said this kind of cruelty isn’t rare in the Russian military and that without proper investigations, their justice system is meaningless.

One of the most alarming parts of the story is that these punishments are not new. Human rights groups and Russian journalists have already reported cases of beatings, mock killings, and torture being used against Russian soldiers who don’t obey orders. Many of these soldiers are imprisoned in basements or cages without a trial, sometimes for weeks, given barely any food or water. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

A lot of the soldiers in these units are either former prisoners, people forced into military service, or untrained volunteers from poor areas of Russia. These groups have suffered heavy losses in the war, especially during Russia’s large-scale attacks on strong Ukrainian defenses. This strategy, where poorly equipped troops are sent forward in huge numbers, has been called a “meatgrinder” by war analysts.

One recent example is the battle in Avdiivka, where thousands of Russian troops died just to gain a small amount of land. Now, a similar situation is starting near Chasiv Yar. These risky and costly operations are often led by lower-ranking commanders like Kama, who are allowed to use any method they want to keep soldiers under control, even if it means using fear or violence.

The Russian government has not responded to this video or the growing reports of illegal punishments in its army. Investigations into these kinds of abuses rarely happen, and the commanders responsible are almost never punished. Without outside pressure or public attention, such brutal treatment is likely to continue unchecked.

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

IN-THE-NEWS

Donald Trump leaves people baffled after seemingly taking credit for historical event and claiming he ‘invented’ common word –

Published

on

By

 

Donald Trump has once again left people scratching their heads after making two strange and surprising claims within a single day. First, he seemed to take some credit for the historic election of Pope Leo XIV, the first American to become Pope. Then, in an unrelated moment, he oddly claimed that he invented the word “equalize,” despite the word being centuries old.

After the recent death of Pope Francis, Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost was chosen as the new Pope, taking the name Pope Leo XIV. In response, Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, congratulating the new Pope and saying it was “a great honor” for the United States. He even said he was looking forward to meeting Pope Leo, calling it a “very meaningful moment.”

But what really raised eyebrows was Trump’s follow-up message, where he implied that he somehow influenced the Pope’s election. He mocked ABC News journalist Martha Raddatz, accusing her of being “Trump-deranged” for suggesting he had nothing to do with the Pope’s rise. Trump argued that since he had won the Catholic vote by a large margin, his popularity may have played a role in Pope Leo’s appointment—though he gave no evidence for such a claim.

Then, during a White House press event about prescription drug pricing, Trump made another bizarre statement. While explaining how his plan would make Americans pay similar prices to those in other countries, he said, “Basically what we’re doing is equalizing. It’s a new word that I came up with… We’re gonna equalize.” He claimed it was the “best word” to describe the situation, seemingly unaware that “equalize” has been in the English language for over 400 years. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

The word “equalize” actually dates back to at least the year 1599, according to dictionaries. It has been used in everyday speech, literature, and even pop culture  like the 1980s TV series The Equalizer long before Trump was in office.

Social media users didn’t hold back their reactions. One person joked, “There was a TV show in the 80s named The Equalizer. Did he invent the word in 1983 and is just reminiscing?” Another commented, “If he made it up, how does everyone already know what it means?” And a third mocked the claim by saying, “Horses**t a word I just came up with, never used by anyone ever!”

While Trump’s supporters often appreciate his confidence and boldness, these latest claims have once again sparked laughter, disbelief, and plenty of memes online.

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

Trending