Connect with us

METRO

This Innocent Man Was Wrongfully Jailed. What He Did Next Will Make You Cry! –

Published

on

By

 

A man who was wrongfully jailed for a crime he didn’t commit was released after 27 years, and what he did next will make you cry.

John Bunn stood at the center of a packed courtroom, every eye fixated on him, the tension thick, an unspoken understanding rippling through the rows of people packed shoulder-to-shoulder in the Brooklyn Supreme Court. His breath caught in his throat as he took a small step forward, his worn shoes echoing on the polished marble floor. Tears welled up in his eyes as he turned toward the prosecutor’s table, his gaze sharp and unflinching despite the tremor in his voice.

“I want y’all to know that y’all had the wrong man in prison.”

Gasps rippled through the courtroom, and the silence shattered. Reporters’ pens scribbled frantically, and camera shutters clicked, capturing the emotion written all over his face. His words hung in the air, thick and undeniable. For 27 years, John had been branded a killer, forced to carry the weight of a crime he didn’t commit, trapped in a nightmare that began when he was just 14 years old. But today, that nightmare was about to end…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

John’s eyes darted to the judge’s bench. Justice Shawn’Dya Simpson met his gaze with a steady look, her lips pressed into a firm line. He took a deep breath and began to speak again, his voice more assertive this time, the pain of decades spilling out with every word.

“It’s been 27 years I’ve been fighting for my life,” he said, his voice breaking on the last word. “Y’all don’t know what it’s like to be a kid and have your whole future stolen, to grow up in a cage, to be treated like an animal.”

The courtroom erupted. Reporters whispered furiously, the gallery buzzed with murmurs, and the judge’s gavel slammed down, calling for order. But John’s words rang louder, more explicit, drowning out the chaos around him.

He stepped closer to the judge’s bench, his hands trembling. Then, in a moment that seemed to freeze time, he reached out and clasped the judge’s hands, his head bowed, shoulders shaking with sobs. The entire courtroom held its breath. This wasn’t just a legal proceeding anymore; it was a raw human moment unfolding before their eyes.

John’s fingers intertwined with Judge Simpson’s, his grip tight as if holding on to a lifeline. His tears fell freely, dotting the polished wood of the judge’s bench.

“I want to thank you, Your Honor,” he choked out, his voice barely a whisper. “Thank you for seeing me as more than just another case.”

Judge Simpson’s eyes softened, her professional demeanor momentarily cracking as she squeezed John’s hands back. The simple gesture spoke volumes, acknowledging his pain, resilience, and the grave injustice he had endured.

“I am more than emotional about this day,” she murmured, her voice thick with sympathy. “You were just a child when this happened. This should never have happened.”

Once filled with noise and tension, the courtroom fell into a stunned silence. The spectators, the lawyers, even the hardened court officers were all moved by this powerful display of humanity. It was a moment that transcended the cold, impersonal nature of the legal system, reminding everyone present of the real lives at stake in these proceedings.

As John slowly released the judge’s hands and stepped back, wiping his eyes with the back of his hand, there wasn’t a dry eye in the house. What he did next would make everyone cry, but these would be tears of hope, of redemption, and of a man determined to turn his pain into purpose.

At that moment, as John stood in the center of the courtroom, the weight of his past bearing down on him, his mind couldn’t help but drift back to where it all began. The fluorescent lights of the courtroom seemed to flicker and fade, replaced by the warm glow of street lamps on a summer night in Brooklyn.

It was a hot summer night in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. The streets buzzed with life, a mix of music, laughter, and the occasional shout drifting through the thick, humid air. Fourteen-year-old John Bunn stood outside the corner bodega, his hands shoved into his pockets as he chatted with a few friends. They were just kids hanging out in the only place they knew, their laughter echoing off the brick buildings lining the street.

John was a typical teenager, lanky with a mop of curly hair and a wide, easy smile. He dreamed of becoming a basketball player, spending hours on the neighborhood courts perfecting his jump shot. His mother worked long hours as a nurse’s aide, and John took pride in helping to look after his younger siblings. He was just a kid on the cusp of adulthood, full of potential and hope for the future.

But that night, something would happen that would change his life forever. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

A black car screeched to a halt before them, its tires kicking up gravel. The doors flew open, and two men in plain clothes stormed out. Before John could react, rough hands grabbed him, twisting his arms behind his back.

“You’re coming with us,” one of the men growled.

John’s protests were drowned out by the blaring sirens that erupted a moment later. He was shoved into the back of the car, confusion and fear knotting in his stomach. He hadn’t done anything wrong; he didn’t even know what was happening. All he knew was that, suddenly, he was being taken to a place he’d only ever heard of in whispered warnings: Rikers Island.

The charges were read to him in a sterile room under the harsh glare of a fluorescent light: second-degree murder, attempted robbery. The words were foreign, monstrous, but the detectives spat them at him with cold, hard certainty. They said he and another teenager, Rosine Hargrave, had ambushed two off-duty correction officers, forced them out of their car, and shot them. One officer died; the other survived.

“I didn’t do it!” John shouted, his voice hoarse. But his cries fell on deaf ears. He was just 14—a child—but that didn’t matter. The system crushed him under its weight, treating him like a grown man, a criminal. They didn’t care that he had an alibi, that the description didn’t match him, or that no fingerprints tied him to the scene. All they cared about was closing the case. And so, with no resources, defense, or anyone to believe him, John Bunn was sentenced to prison for a crime he didn’t commit.

The first few months in Rikers were a blur of fear and violence. John quickly learned that survival meant staying invisible. But even then, trouble seemed to find him. He was beaten, taunted, and isolated. Every day felt like a battle, and there were moments when he thought he wouldn’t make it out alive.

“I’ll prove I’m innocent,” he would whisper at night, curled up on the cold, hard bed in his tiny cell. “One day, I’ll prove it.”

But as the years went by, that hope dimmed. Letters to lawyers went unanswered, appeals were denied. By the time he was 18, John had been moved upstate, where the prison walls were higher, the guards colder, and the violence even worse. He grew up behind bars, watching the world pass him by.

Seventeen long years went by before he was finally granted parole. But even then, freedom was just an illusion.

“I was still a prisoner,” he would later say, “still branded a murderer.”

The world outside had changed dramatically during his incarceration. Technology had advanced, social norms had shifted, and John felt like a man out of time. Simple tasks like using a cell phone or navigating public transportation became daunting. But the most challenging part was the stigma—the sideways glances, the whispered conversations, the doors that closed in his face when people learned of his past.

Despite these obstacles, John was determined to make something of his life. He worked odd jobs, anything he could find that would hire someone with his background. He attended community college classes, hungry for the education he’d been denied. And all the while, he never stopped fighting to clear his name.

It wasn’t until 2016 that the tide began to turn. John had spent nearly a decade outside prison, fighting tooth and nail to clear his name. He’d pored over legal documents, filed appeal after appeal, and finally, a breakthrough came. Louis Scarcella, the lead detective on his case, was exposed for using false and misleading practices. It turned out John wasn’t the only one—dozens of other men had been wrongfully convicted based on Scarcella’s tainted evidence. Once praised as a hero, the detective was scrutinized for a career built on lies.

For John, it was vindication, but it was also a bitter pill to swallow. Seventeen years of his life were gone, and for what? Because a corrupt detective needed a conviction.

And now, standing in the courtroom, his entire journey came full circle. The prosecutor’s office finally admitted they had the wrong man. His conviction was thrown out. He was at last an innocent man in the eyes of the law.

So, he walked out of the box and went to the front, holding out his hand to the judge while crying profusely. She held his hand, too, and as he stood there, holding the judge’s hands, the weight of 27 years seemed to lift from his shoulders. The pain, the anger, the despair—all of it was washed away by the overwhelming relief of finally being seen, truly seen for who he was. Not a criminal, but a man who had been wronged.

And as the courtroom erupted in applause, tears of joy and sorrow streaming down his face, John whispered to himself, “I made it. I really made

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

METRO

Guy Fawkes’ punishment was one of the most severe in English history – here’s what happens when a body is hung, drawn and quartered

Published

on

By

Fawkes and his co-conspirators were sentenced to hanging, drawing and quartering. Crispijn van de Passe the Elder/ Wikimedia Commons

After their infamous plot to destroy parliament was foiled, Guy Fawkes and his co-conspirators received one of the most severe judicial sentences in English history: hanging, drawing and quartering. According to the Treason Act 1351 , this punishment involved…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

Author

  • Michelle SpearProfessor of Anatomy, University of Bristol

That you be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution, where you shall be hanged by the neck and being alive cut down, your privy members shall be cut off and your bowels taken out and burned before you, your head severed from your body and your body divided into four quarters to be disposed of at the King’s pleasure.

This process aimed not only to inflict excruciating pain on the condemned, but to serve as a deterrent – demonstrating the fate of those who betrayed the Crown. While Fawkes reportedly jumped from the gallows – which meant he avoided the full extent of his punishment – his co-conspirators apparently weren’t so lucky.

By dissecting each stage of this medieval punishment from an anatomical perspective, we can understand the profound agony each of them endured.

Torture for confession

Before his public execution on January 31 1606, Fawkes was tortured to force a confession about his involvement in the “gunpowder plot”.

The Tower of London records confirm that King James I personally authorised “the gentler tortures first”. Accounts reveal that Fawkes was stretched on the rack – a device designed to slowly pull the limbs in opposite directions. This stretching inflicted severe trauma on the shoulders, elbows and hips, as well as the spine.

The forces exerted by the rack probably exceeded those required for joint or hip dislocation under normal conditions.

Substantive differences between Fawkes’ signatures on confessions between November 8 and shortly before his execution may indicate the amount of nerve and soft tissue damage sustained. It also illustrates how remarkable his final leap from the gallows was.

An engraving depicting a person being tortured on the rack.
The rack slowly pulled a prisoner’s limbs in opposite directions. Wellcome Collection/ Wikimedia Commons , CC BY-SA

Stage 1: hanging (partial strangulation)

After surviving the torture of the rack, Fawkes and his gang faced the next stage of their punishment: hanging. But this form of hanging only partially strangled the condemned – preserving their consciousness and prolonging their suffering.

Partial strangulation exerts extreme pressure on several critical neck structures. The hyoid bone , a small u-shaped structure above the larynx, is prone to bruising or fracture under compression .

Simultaneously, pressure on the carotid arteries restricts blood flow to the brain, while compression of the jugular veins causes pooling of blood in the head – probably resulting in visible haemorrhages in the eyes and face.

Because the larynx and trachea (both essential for airflow) are partially obstructed, this makes breathing laboured. Strain on the cervical spine and surrounding muscles in the neck can lead to tearing, muscle spasms or dislocation of the vertebra – causing severe pain. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Fawkes brought his agony to a premature end by leaping from the gallows. Accounts from the time tell us:

His body being weak with the torture and sickness, he was scarce able to go up the ladder – yet with much ado, by the help of the hangman, went high enough to break his neck by the fall.

This probably caused him to suffer a bilateral fracture of his second cervical vertebra, assisted by his own bodyweight – an injury known as the “hangman’s fracture” .

Stage 2: Drawing (disembowelment)

After enduring partial hanging, the victim would then be “drawn” – a process which involved disembowelling them while still alive. This act mainly targeted the organs of the abdominal cavity – including the intestines, liver and kidney, as well as major blood vessels such as the abdominal aorta.

The physiological response to disembowelment would have been immediate and severe. The abdominal cavity possesses a high concentration of pain receptors – particularly around the membranous lining of the abdomen . When punctured, these pain receptors would have sent intense pain signals to the brain, overwhelming the body’s capacity for pain management . Shock would soon follow due to the rapid drop in blood pressure caused by massive amounts of blood loss.

Stage 3: quartering (dismemberment)

Quartering was also supposed to be performed while the victim was still alive. Though no accounts exist detailing at what phase victims typically lost consciousness during execution, it’s highly unlikely many survived the shock of being drawn.

So, at this stage, publicity superseded punishment given the victim’s likely earlier demise. Limbs that were removed from criminals were preserved by boiling them with spices. These were then toured around the country to act as a deterrent for others.

Though accounts suggest Fawkes’s body parts were sent to “the four corners of the United Kingdom”, there is no specific record of what was sent where. However, his head was displayed in London .

Traitor’s punishment

The punishment of hanging, drawing and quartering was designed to be as anatomically devastating as it was psychologically terrifying. Each stage of the process exploited the vulnerabilities of the human body to create maximum pain and suffering, while also serving as a grim reminder of the consequences of treason.

This punishment also gives us an insight into how medieval justice systems used the body as a canvas for social and political messaging. Fawkes’s fate, though unimaginable today, exemplifies the extremes to which the state could, and would, go to maintain control, power and authority over its subjects.

The sentence of hanging, drawing and quartering was officially removed from English law as part of the Forfeiture Act of 1870 .

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

OPINION: 4 Children Who Were Sentenced to life imprisonment At A Young Age And what They Did

Published

on

By

There are many unusual things happening across the world. Children are charming and lovely, yet others are really dangerous and have been involved in a variety of illegal activities in society.

In this post, we’ll look at four children who were condemned to life in jail Please keep in mind that some of these children are now adults…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

1. Joshua Phillips:

Joshua Phillips stabbed his neighbor’s eight-year-old daughter and put the girl’s body under his bed at home. After eight days, his mother discovered the body.

Joshua Phillips was fourteen years old when he committed this act, according to reports, and he was sentenced to life in jail.

Take a look at how Joshua Phillips is now.

2. Eric Smith:

Eric Smith, according to sources, was condemned to life in jail many years ago. Eric Smith was just 13 years old when he hit a 4-year-old boy with a rock and killed him.

Following multiple conversations with Eric, he stated that he was bullied by several senior kids at his school and that he killed the youngster because he was irritated and upset. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

3. Lionel Tate:

Lionel Tate was one of the youngest people to get a life sentence.

According to sources, when he was 13 years old, Lionel Tate killed his neighbor’s six-year-old daughter.

Lionel Tate claimed he was boxing with the young girl.

4. Brian Lee Draper:

Brian Lee Draper was sentenced to life in prison in 2006 for murdering a classmate, according to reports.

The murder was committed by Brian Lee Draper and his friend Torey Adamcik, who was sixteen years old at the time.

Parents should always endeavor to teach their children how to be good children, as well as pray for them.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

Lady Caught Feeding Neighbor’s Baby With Faeces & Urine Speaks From Prison, Gives This Ugly Reason

Published

on

By

A woman named Stella Namwanje was arrested in Uganda for allegedly committing an atrocious act against her neighbor’s baby. Reports indicate that she was caught on video defecating and urinating on the infant before feeding him the waste. This shocking behavior has drawn widespread condemnation and raised serious concerns about the child’s welfare…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

The incident took place in the Binyonyi A area of the Nyendo-Mukungwe division. Local authorities acted swiftly after the disturbing footage circulated on social media, prompting community outrage. The police have since taken Namwanje into custody to investigate the circumstances surrounding her actions and ensure the safety of the child.

The case has sparked discussions about the need for stronger measures to protect vulnerable individuals, especially children, from abuse. It highlights the alarming reality of child torture and the psychological issues that may drive such behavior. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

As the investigation unfolds, the community is rallying to support the affected family and prevent similar incidents in the future. The legal proceedings against Namwanje will likely focus on the extent of her actions and the necessary repercussions for such a heinous crime.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!