Connect with us

METRO

4 Countries Where Woman Is Allowed To Marry More Than One Husband Check For Number three

Published

on

By

Polyandry, the practice of a woman marrying more than one husband at the same time, is relatively rare worldwide. It is most commonly found in societies where resources, such as land or wealth, are scarce and must be shared among many people. In such societies, it may be advantageous for a woman to have more than one husband because it allows her to have additional support in providing for her children and household. However, polyandry is also practiced in some societies for cultural or spiritual reasons.

There are a few countries where polyandry is legally recognized and practiced. These include:

1. Tibet: Polyandry has a long history in Tibetan culture, and it was traditionally practiced in certain regions of Tibet. In a polyandrous relationship, the wives are equal partners and share the responsibilities of running the household and raising the children. The husbands, on the other hand, are expected to provide for the family and protect them. Polyandry was outlawed in Tibet during the Chinese occupation, but it has been legalized once again in the Tibetan Autonomous Region…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

2. Nepal: Polyandry is legally recognized in Nepal and is practiced in certain parts of the country, especially in the mountainous regions. In Nepal, polyandry is typically practiced in a fraternal form, where a group of brothers marry the same woman and have children with her. The children are considered to be the offspring of all the brothers and are equally entitled to the family’s resources. Polyandry in Nepal is believed to help reduce conflict over inheritance and property. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

3. India: Polyandry is illegal in India, but it is practiced in some parts of the country, especially in the state of Tamil Nadu. In these communities, polyandry is typically practiced in a fraternal form, similar to Nepal. The main reason for polyandry in these communities is to keep land and other resources within the family.

4. Kenya: Polyandry is also practiced in some parts of Kenya, particularly among the Maasai people. In a Maasai polyandrous relationship, the woman is considered the head of the household and has the final say in all decisions. The husbands are expected to contribute to the household and protect their wives and children. Polyandry in Kenya is believed to help ensure the financial stability of the household and to reduce the risk of HIV transmission.

While polyandry is legal in these countries, it is important to note that it is still a minority practice and is not widely accepted in most societies. In many countries, polyandry is seen as a violation of traditional marriage norms and is not recognized by the law. In addition, polyandry can be a source of conflict and can lead to complications when it comes to issues such as inheritance and child custody.

In conclusion, polyandry, the practice of a woman marrying more than one husband at the same time, is relatively rare worldwide and is only legally recognized in a few countries. It is typically practiced in societies where resources are scarce and must be shared among many people, or for cultural or spiritual reasons. While it may offer some advantages, such as providing additional support for the woman and her children, it is not widely accepted and can be a source of conflict.

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

METRO

Nurses got fired immediately after ‘stunning video showed what they did to a newborn’s face’!

Published

on

By

 

As all parents know by now, nurses are responsible for the daily care of your baby. They will feed, change, and bathe your baby. They will also give medicines and keep track of vital signs – like temperature, breathing, and heart rate); and monitor medical equipment.

But, unfortunately, sometimes they forget what’s their job description. Per reports. a group of nurses reportedly recorded themselves doing the unthinkable a newborn’s face fired after video infuriates public.

The group of nurses who recorded themselves chuckling while cruelly crushing the face of a hospitalized newborn have actually been fired after their video was flowed online.

The baby’s household discovered the worrying treatment their kid had actually gotten at the hands of these nurses after the video was shared on social networks. In the stunning video, a nurse can be seen consistently getting the baby by the neck and forehead, and inhumanely crushing the child’s face, while the onlooking nurses chuckled…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

The 3 nurses, who were operating at a maternity ward were rapidly determined and found. The Health Affairs examined the source of the video and had the ability to determine the nurses who appeared in the video and the medical facility where the event occurred,’ stated representative Abdulhadi. After being determined, the nurses were quickly suspended from their positions at the maternity medical facility. They have because had their medical licenses withdrawed and have actually been prohibited from practicing nursing in other health departments. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

The newborn’s daddy notified media his child had actually remained in the health center for 10 days for treatment of a urinary system infection and was horrified after seeing the video commonly flowed on social networks platforms. He has actually required the nurses, in addition to those who distributed the upsetting video, to be penalized. Some have actually recommended that CCTV needs to be set up throughout the healthcare facility to assist in avoiding the incident of a comparable occasion.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

Man who indecently assaulted 4 girls walked free when the judge explained to the victims why ‘jail isn’t appropriate’!

Published

on

By

 

According to the court documents, the 20-year-old defendant, Christopher, pleaded guilty to ra-ing one young girl and se-ually abusing three others over the course of a year.

But, unfortunately,, thanks to the judge’s sympathy, he won’t even set foot inside of a prison cell for any of his crimes. The victims of the defendant are tormented by the fact that their se-ual abuser will not be jailed for his actions. The defendant was formally charged with first-degree ra-e, third-degree ra-e, and se-ual abuse involving multiple minors when he was only 17 years old.

The abuse occurred over the course of a year at his home. He later pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree se* abuse, third-degree attempted abuse, and third-degree ra-e.

Per reports, Judge Murphy said in front of Belter and his victims that he agonized over whether or not to imprison the rapist. He then announced that Belter would receive no jail time and just eight years of probation for his crimes because jailing him wouldn’t be an appropriate sentence…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

Judge Murphy went on to say that he came to his decision based on the ra-ist’s age at the time of the crimes. The defendant was 16 or 17 when he ra-ed a teen girl and se-ually abused three others, whose ages ranged from 15 to 16 years. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

“I agonized — I’m not ashamed to say that I actually prayed over what is the appropriate sentence in this case. because there was great pain. There was great harm — There were multiple crimes committed in the case,” Judge Murphy explained. “It seems to me that a sentence that involves incarceration or partial incarceration isn’t appropriate, so I am going to sentence you to probation.” Although the defendant is required to register as a se* offender, he received a sentence of two years interim probation which, if completed, will earn him Youthful Offender status. His probation restrictions include no contact with minors, living with his parents, employment or full-time student status, and no internet. “It’s going to be like a sword hanging over your head for the next eight years,” Judge Murphy remarked.

Christopher’s victims learned in court that he would receive no jail time. Understandably, they were stunned and disgusted with the judge’s decision.

One of the victim’s attorneys attributed the merciful sentence to Christopher’s race and economic status. “I am deeply, deeply disappointed. I expected a different outcome today,” declared Cohen, attorney. “Justice was not done today. He is privileged. He comes from money. He is white. He was sentenced as an adult, appropriately — for an adult to get away with these crimes is unjust.”

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

Police thought disabled woman is a killer, they wheeled her to the judge and ‘she said these 5 chilling words’!

Published

on

By

 

According to the court documents, the 50-year-old disabled woman, Asenka, was reportedly charged with murder for allegedly killing her mother.

The woman appeared in court and had an interesting request for the judge. Per reports, Asenka was charged with the murder of her 75-year-old mother at the home they shared and then dug a grave for her in the backyard.

She was brought into the court in a wheelchair, where she requested ‘the unexpexted’. Among the many people who commented about this incident, one person remarked: “Give her what she wants.”

Per reports, the 50-year-old woman reportedly said: “I want the death penalty. Lethal injection, please. The court does not want me alive, and neither do I.” She had reportedly told detectives that her mother, Carole, abused her physically over the years. When they fought the previous week, she punched her mother in the head and she passed away…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

  READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

The woman then spent the rest of the day digging a grave, stopping when she became exhausted. She later went to a neighbor’s house to say her mother had died, with the neighbor calling 911 to request a welfare check. When police arrived, they found the victim’s body in the bedroom and a hole in the ground several feet deep.

Police reviewed Asenka’s phone to discover she had taken photos after her mother’s killing, including injuries to her hands and arms that she allegedly sustained during ther fight. Prosecutors noted that the victim had obtained a restraining order against Asenka last year and filed to renew it, but the order was dropped when they didn’t appear at the court hearing. Asenka’s attorney argued that his client was afraid of her mother because of the alleged abuse, but a friend of the victim that the older woman was very petite and said she had talked about her daughter’s mental health problems.

Among the many people who commented about the murder case, one person remarked: “Give her what she wants. I know they can do it and quickly because years ago a man who had killed and abused two boys asked to be hanged and he was within the year.” Another commenter added: “How sweet of her to tell the court what she wants. Her mother didn’t have a choice and I presume she didn’t want to be murdered. Let her go crazy and rot in a cell.” One commenter agreed, noting: “Too easy! Let her suffer for the rest of her life for what she did. I suspect the wheelchair is a prop!”

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

Trending