Connect with us

METRO

Priest Sets Up Camera to Catch Offering Thief, But What He Discovers Leaves Him Stunned –

Published

on

By

 


Frank Albert was the devoted priest of St. Thomas Parish, dedicated to guiding his congregation and ensuring everything was handled properly.

However, trouble began when the church’s offerings mysteriously disappeared. Determined to uncover the truth, Frank embarked on an investigation that would reveal a shocking discovery Frank Albert was never the most beloved priest. Since his transfer to St. Thomas Parish, he could count on one hand the number of times he had been invited to a parishioner’s home…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

He wasn’t the kind of priest who drew crowds or had children eagerly seeking a quick blessing. While everyone showed him the respect due to a priest, they kept their distance and avoided becoming too familiar.

The reason was clear: Frank Albert simply wasn’t a people person. He didn’t intentionally push people away or act in ways that created barriers—it was more about the intangible aura he carried. There was something about him that made others feel uneasy in his presence. It was a subtle but unmistakable discomfort that led many parishioners to maintain a polite but cautious distance.

Despite this, Frank Albert managed to run the parish properly. He was frugal with the church’s expenses and made sure everything was in top shape all the time. When he said Mass, he never kept it too long, and that was something the people liked about him. The previous priest always finished Mass late, but with Frank Albert, it was rare for Mass to last more than two hours. Everything was going well in the church; the people and priest found a way to coexist. But then something happened that threatened to tear the parish apart.

One morning, while checking the donations from the previous day, Frank Albert noticed something disturbing: the offering basket was empty. All of the money that was donated on Sunday was gone. Frank Albert was distraught. The money was important for running the affairs of the parish, and its sudden disappearance would take a toll on its finances. Stealing from the church was akin to stealing from God, so who would dare to do such a thing?

The priest kept quiet about the situation. He chose not to tell the elders to avoid alarming them, and he didn’t inform the police because he didn’t want the matter to get out of hand or create a bad name for the church. Meanwhile, he made up for the stolen money with his own funds. But over the week, he decided to launch his own investigation to see if he could identify the thief.

During morning masses on weekdays, Frank Albert centered his sermons on stealing and taking things from the house of God. While preaching, he tried to study the reactions of his parishioners, hoping someone would give themselves away with their countenance. Unfortunately, this approach didn’t work.

Another Sunday came, and by Monday morning, the offering was gone again. When Frank Albert noticed this, he was at his wit’s end. He still had no clue who the thief was and remained reluctant to inform the elders of the church. Instead, he imposed strict measures on the parishioners. Henceforth, the offering would be kept in a safe, and no one except a select few would have access to it. In this way, if the money went missing again, he would know who to hold responsible.

But that week, the problem wasn’t just the missing offering—other strange things began to happen as well, and Frank Albert had no explanation for them. Later that week, on Wednesday, Frank Albert woke up with an injury on his big toe. It looked like he had hit it against something, but that was impossible because the night before, his toe was perfectly fine. So how did it happen?

Despite the injured toe, he didn’t let it stop him from carrying out the day’s activities. He prepared to say the morning Mass, but he couldn’t wear his shoes or sandals because of the injury, so he made do with his slippers. The church members were shocked when they saw their parish priest in slippers. He also looked haggard and unkempt, but they said nothing about it. However, over the next few days, the number of parishioners attending morning Mass dropped drastically.

The next Sunday, Frank Albert woke up with a severe headache, and his vision was blurry. He felt tired and weighed down, but as always, he pushed through it all and prepared for Mass. However, during the Mass, he suddenly had a strong urge to sleep. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

It got so bad that while giving communion, he dozed off for a few seconds, and the host fell out of his hands. Thankfully, the altar boy beside him quickly caught it in the communion plate. This didn’t just happen once—it happened three different times.

By now, people were beginning to notice the priest’s strange behavior, but none of them could confront him. They decided to tell the elders, who then chose to talk to him after Mass. The last thing the elders wanted was for people to lose faith in their priest. Just as Frank Albert was about to dismiss the Mass, something quite terrifying happened. The door suddenly flew open, and a haggard-looking man ran in. His hair was unkempt, and his clothes were dirty. The church wardens ran after him and began to pull him out, but he started screaming,
“We’re all going to die! We’re stealing from God! We’re going to die! I have seen this in my dream!”

The parishioners were so frightened that many of them began to whisper terrible things among themselves.
“Do we have a thief in the house of God? Who is the thief?” they said, looking around at one another with suspicion.

At that moment, Frank Albert decided to tell them about the stolen offerings. He took his time apologizing for not informing them sooner and assured them that he was doing all he could to find the thief and put an end to the sacrilege.

However, as he spoke, he noticed that the church members were not looking at him. Instead, they were staring at the man sitting in the far corner of the church, regarding him with suspicion. This was because the man was an ex-convict who had been arrested for armed robbery and had only recently been released. Frank Albert asked them not to judge or suspect anyone yet and promised to get to the root of the matter.

After the Mass, the priest had a meeting with the elders, and they suggested that he place cameras in the room where the offerings were kept and in the parish shops. That evening, they bought the cameras and installed them. As usual, by Monday morning, the offering was gone. But Frank Albert was not worried—he knew the camera would finally reveal the thief.

That night, he connected the camera to his computer and clicked on the video from the previous night. He was relieved that he could finally catch the thief. But what he saw made his blood run cold. As soon as the video began to play, Frank Albert couldn’t believe his eyes. He saw himself unlock the safe room, walk in, and pick up the offering. Then, he came out of the room and locked it. Seeing all this, he fell back in shock. He was the thief.

He placed his hands over his mouth and tried to suppress a scream. How could he not remember stealing the money? As he continued watching, he saw that he took the money to his room. He searched his closet and then under his bed, and there it was—every single offering that had been stolen was under the bed.
“My God,” he gasped. “What have I done?” he cried loudly.

Although hurt by his own actions, he was quite surprised because he had no memory of stealing the church’s offerings.
“Oh God, please come to my rescue. Save me, Lord. When did I steal from the church?” he wept loudly as he watched the video.

Just then, a realization hit him. Frank Albert had been a sleepwalker in his youth. His family used to recount his nocturnal escapades, like the time he wandered outside, opened the front door, and slept in the yard. By the time he turned 16, the sleepwalking episodes had ceased, leading him to believe they were a thing of the past. However, he now understood that the sleepwalking had returned. Each instance of him rising from bed to pilfer the church’s offerings was a result of this condition. This also explained his memory lapses and the recent injury to his toe.

The following day, Frank sought medical advice. His doctor prescribed medication to help regulate his sleep. The day after, Frank wrote a letter to his bishop requesting a leave of absence to address his condition. When Sunday arrived, he candidly shared his struggle with the congregation, admitting his role in the missing money and apologizing for his actions. His honesty resonated deeply with the parishioners, fostering a greater sense of empathy and solidarity. They offered him their support and eagerly anticipated his return once his leave was concluded.

 


READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

METRO

Guy Fawkes’ punishment was one of the most severe in English history – here’s what happens when a body is hung, drawn and quartered

Published

on

By

Fawkes and his co-conspirators were sentenced to hanging, drawing and quartering. Crispijn van de Passe the Elder/ Wikimedia Commons

After their infamous plot to destroy parliament was foiled, Guy Fawkes and his co-conspirators received one of the most severe judicial sentences in English history: hanging, drawing and quartering. According to the Treason Act 1351 , this punishment involved…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

Author

  • Michelle SpearProfessor of Anatomy, University of Bristol

That you be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution, where you shall be hanged by the neck and being alive cut down, your privy members shall be cut off and your bowels taken out and burned before you, your head severed from your body and your body divided into four quarters to be disposed of at the King’s pleasure.

This process aimed not only to inflict excruciating pain on the condemned, but to serve as a deterrent – demonstrating the fate of those who betrayed the Crown. While Fawkes reportedly jumped from the gallows – which meant he avoided the full extent of his punishment – his co-conspirators apparently weren’t so lucky.

By dissecting each stage of this medieval punishment from an anatomical perspective, we can understand the profound agony each of them endured.

Torture for confession

Before his public execution on January 31 1606, Fawkes was tortured to force a confession about his involvement in the “gunpowder plot”.

The Tower of London records confirm that King James I personally authorised “the gentler tortures first”. Accounts reveal that Fawkes was stretched on the rack – a device designed to slowly pull the limbs in opposite directions. This stretching inflicted severe trauma on the shoulders, elbows and hips, as well as the spine.

The forces exerted by the rack probably exceeded those required for joint or hip dislocation under normal conditions.

Substantive differences between Fawkes’ signatures on confessions between November 8 and shortly before his execution may indicate the amount of nerve and soft tissue damage sustained. It also illustrates how remarkable his final leap from the gallows was.

An engraving depicting a person being tortured on the rack.
The rack slowly pulled a prisoner’s limbs in opposite directions. Wellcome Collection/ Wikimedia Commons , CC BY-SA

Stage 1: hanging (partial strangulation)

After surviving the torture of the rack, Fawkes and his gang faced the next stage of their punishment: hanging. But this form of hanging only partially strangled the condemned – preserving their consciousness and prolonging their suffering.

Partial strangulation exerts extreme pressure on several critical neck structures. The hyoid bone , a small u-shaped structure above the larynx, is prone to bruising or fracture under compression .

Simultaneously, pressure on the carotid arteries restricts blood flow to the brain, while compression of the jugular veins causes pooling of blood in the head – probably resulting in visible haemorrhages in the eyes and face.

Because the larynx and trachea (both essential for airflow) are partially obstructed, this makes breathing laboured. Strain on the cervical spine and surrounding muscles in the neck can lead to tearing, muscle spasms or dislocation of the vertebra – causing severe pain. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Fawkes brought his agony to a premature end by leaping from the gallows. Accounts from the time tell us:

His body being weak with the torture and sickness, he was scarce able to go up the ladder – yet with much ado, by the help of the hangman, went high enough to break his neck by the fall.

This probably caused him to suffer a bilateral fracture of his second cervical vertebra, assisted by his own bodyweight – an injury known as the “hangman’s fracture” .

Stage 2: Drawing (disembowelment)

After enduring partial hanging, the victim would then be “drawn” – a process which involved disembowelling them while still alive. This act mainly targeted the organs of the abdominal cavity – including the intestines, liver and kidney, as well as major blood vessels such as the abdominal aorta.

The physiological response to disembowelment would have been immediate and severe. The abdominal cavity possesses a high concentration of pain receptors – particularly around the membranous lining of the abdomen . When punctured, these pain receptors would have sent intense pain signals to the brain, overwhelming the body’s capacity for pain management . Shock would soon follow due to the rapid drop in blood pressure caused by massive amounts of blood loss.

Stage 3: quartering (dismemberment)

Quartering was also supposed to be performed while the victim was still alive. Though no accounts exist detailing at what phase victims typically lost consciousness during execution, it’s highly unlikely many survived the shock of being drawn.

So, at this stage, publicity superseded punishment given the victim’s likely earlier demise. Limbs that were removed from criminals were preserved by boiling them with spices. These were then toured around the country to act as a deterrent for others.

Though accounts suggest Fawkes’s body parts were sent to “the four corners of the United Kingdom”, there is no specific record of what was sent where. However, his head was displayed in London .

Traitor’s punishment

The punishment of hanging, drawing and quartering was designed to be as anatomically devastating as it was psychologically terrifying. Each stage of the process exploited the vulnerabilities of the human body to create maximum pain and suffering, while also serving as a grim reminder of the consequences of treason.

This punishment also gives us an insight into how medieval justice systems used the body as a canvas for social and political messaging. Fawkes’s fate, though unimaginable today, exemplifies the extremes to which the state could, and would, go to maintain control, power and authority over its subjects.

The sentence of hanging, drawing and quartering was officially removed from English law as part of the Forfeiture Act of 1870 .

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

OPINION: 4 Children Who Were Sentenced to life imprisonment At A Young Age And what They Did

Published

on

By

There are many unusual things happening across the world. Children are charming and lovely, yet others are really dangerous and have been involved in a variety of illegal activities in society.

In this post, we’ll look at four children who were condemned to life in jail Please keep in mind that some of these children are now adults…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

1. Joshua Phillips:

Joshua Phillips stabbed his neighbor’s eight-year-old daughter and put the girl’s body under his bed at home. After eight days, his mother discovered the body.

Joshua Phillips was fourteen years old when he committed this act, according to reports, and he was sentenced to life in jail.

Take a look at how Joshua Phillips is now.

2. Eric Smith:

Eric Smith, according to sources, was condemned to life in jail many years ago. Eric Smith was just 13 years old when he hit a 4-year-old boy with a rock and killed him.

Following multiple conversations with Eric, he stated that he was bullied by several senior kids at his school and that he killed the youngster because he was irritated and upset. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

3. Lionel Tate:

Lionel Tate was one of the youngest people to get a life sentence.

According to sources, when he was 13 years old, Lionel Tate killed his neighbor’s six-year-old daughter.

Lionel Tate claimed he was boxing with the young girl.

4. Brian Lee Draper:

Brian Lee Draper was sentenced to life in prison in 2006 for murdering a classmate, according to reports.

The murder was committed by Brian Lee Draper and his friend Torey Adamcik, who was sixteen years old at the time.

Parents should always endeavor to teach their children how to be good children, as well as pray for them.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

Lady Caught Feeding Neighbor’s Baby With Faeces & Urine Speaks From Prison, Gives This Ugly Reason

Published

on

By

A woman named Stella Namwanje was arrested in Uganda for allegedly committing an atrocious act against her neighbor’s baby. Reports indicate that she was caught on video defecating and urinating on the infant before feeding him the waste. This shocking behavior has drawn widespread condemnation and raised serious concerns about the child’s welfare…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

The incident took place in the Binyonyi A area of the Nyendo-Mukungwe division. Local authorities acted swiftly after the disturbing footage circulated on social media, prompting community outrage. The police have since taken Namwanje into custody to investigate the circumstances surrounding her actions and ensure the safety of the child.

The case has sparked discussions about the need for stronger measures to protect vulnerable individuals, especially children, from abuse. It highlights the alarming reality of child torture and the psychological issues that may drive such behavior. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

As the investigation unfolds, the community is rallying to support the affected family and prevent similar incidents in the future. The legal proceedings against Namwanje will likely focus on the extent of her actions and the necessary repercussions for such a heinous crime.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!