Connect with us


The Perfect Woman’s Body, According to Science




“Beauty has no size, no skin tone, no hair color, no eye color, no facial features, no muscle definition… for we are all uniquely beautiful and the standards are unreal.” – Anonymous

Beauty is one of those social standards that shouldn’t exist, but here we are. Every decade, a fresh concept takes hold, and everyone scrambles to fit in with whatever is deemed the best. Blonde hair and light-colored skin were popular in the 1950s, especially during Marilyn Monroe’s reign. It hardly mattered what your physical type was. If you meet the major criteria, you will have to go through several hoops. In the 1960s, people admired willowy women with adolescent bodies. The 1980s were all about athletic, curvaceous women with toned arms. The ’90s favored ultra-thin women with transparent skin…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>


From 2000 to the present, and supported by scientists (of all people), the ideal woman must have huge breasts, a massive buttock, an iron-flat stomach, a small waistline, thigh gaps, and flawless skin. Think about Jennifer Lopez, Beyoncé, Kim Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner, and it doesn’t matter how they got their gorgeous bodies.

Despite the present vogue for huge buttocks and boobs, fashion businesses and modeling agencies have stuck to 1990s standards, preferring extraordinarily slender, tall women with well-defined facial characteristics. Think: Olga Sherer, Kim Noorda, and Kaia Gerber. Many women have endured excruciating suffering to obtain this ultra-thin body size, but thankfully, strong voices are being made calling for a reconsideration of these standards.

Large breasts, a thin waist, and large hips

Although the notions are similar, science has a more clear vision of what an ideal attractive woman should look like.

According to academics at the University of Texas, the truly beautiful female figure conforms to 2000s norms. The ideal lady stands 1.68 meters tall, with a bust, waist, and hips measuring 99, 63, and 91 cm, respectively. That’s also 5’5 ft. tall, with bust, waist, and hip measurements of 38.9, 24.8, and 35.8 inches, respectively.

If you’re looking for someone who currently possesses these stats, consider Kelly Brooks.

Kelly Ann Parsons, better known by her professional name Kelly Brooks, is an English model, actress, and media personality. Kelly satisfies the scientists’ requirements and has steadily caused waves in the fashion and modeling industries. Known as a global style icon, the forty-year-old was named FHM’s sexiest woman alive in 2005 and has been modeling since she was sixteen.

Kelly’s modeling career did not always go smoothly. She was periodically turned down by agencies because she was “too plump”. They were always looking for the thinnest women available, and Kelly didn’t meet the criteria. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Kelly is still running a flourishing career fuelled by advertising campaigns for large firms, and she is the poster girl for perfection, according to science.

What’s so special about the 99-63-91 spec?

Several previous and contemporary research have found that males are more attracted to curvier females.

This is because the male psyche subconsciously associates young curviness with fecundity. Attractiveness is strongly predicated on the ability to reproduce, and in this regard, the most attractive women appear to be most suited for childbirth. This is where the term “childbearing hips” came from.

The 99-63-91 body with a height of 1.68m exhibits these so-called fertile and young qualities. However, various factors influence a woman’s fertility, with physical shape playing just a minor role. Infertility concerns can affect anyone, regardless of size, although obesity has been linked to infertility, miscarriages, and pregnancy complications in women.

The scientists may have a point, but beauty is always subjective and depends on one’s criteria.

The truth you should know about the preferred body type in modeling

According to Jennifer Lee, a fashion expert who worked with Chanel’s top designer, the late Karl Lagerfeld, models are chosen entirely for the items they would wear.

The modeling and fashion industries are not particularly interested in beauty standards. Skinny ladies are frequently picked because they are less likely to draw an audience’s focus away from the garments.

Ms. Lee argues that if curvaceous women are hired to model clothes and sell accessories, consumers will end up admiring their bodies rather than the products.

To summarize, beauty exists in everyone, and we should all aspire to be individuals who do not conform to artificial and human-defined beauty standards. Consider how the world would seem if everyone had the same body type, skin color, hair color, or even facial traits. It would be a dull, dreary place with no tasteful diversity. This indicates that every type is important, and women may hold their heads high and love themselves wholeheartedly since we are all perfect in our own way.

The post The Perfect Woman’s Body, According to Science appeared first on Timeless Life.


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Why Harry and Meghan decided to change their children’s names after they were born




The children of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex underwent a name change last year

It’s a long time since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced their move to the US out of the royal family spotlight to raise their children in the sunshine – and the couple’s choice to change the kids’ names after their birth has been explained…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

Reportedly, Meghan and Harry, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, first started dating in 2016 and went public with their romance that same year.

Not wasting any time, in November 2017, the besotted couple announced their engagement and in 2018 they were married in a televised wedding within St. George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle.

In November 2018, Meghan’s first pregnancy was announced, with their son, Archie, arriving in 2019.

Meghan being a woman of colour signalled a time of great hope and progression in the royal family, but controversy followed with the two stepping back from their duties as senior royals in 2020.

After their daughter, Lilibet was born in 2021, the pair took part in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey in which Meghan claimed a member of the royal household made comments about how dark Archie’s skin would be. She also claimed her treatment had a severe affect on her mental health.

They told their full story in their own words with the release of Netflix’s documentary Harry & Meghan in 2022.

Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for W+P

It was clear that Meghan held many other members of the household in incredibly high esteem – her daughter’s name, Lilibet, is a nickname for Elizabeth, the name of the late Queen.

With the two now living and working in LA, they have managed to shun a lot of the negative attention and press – but fans still love learning every detail about the family. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Some were surprised that Meghan and Harry changed the last names of their children – but it’s been revealed just why they did it.

Matt Dunham – WPA Pool/Getty Images

The children switched from Mountbatten-Windsor to Sussex.

It has been reported that the reason for this leads back to the coronation of King Charles on 6 May, 2023.

Archie and Lilibet were moved up in the line of succession following the coronation, and the little ones were bestowed with the new titles of Prince and Princess of Sussex.

Pool/Samir Hussein/WireImage

Previously, they were officially Master Archie and Miss Lilibet.

A lesser-known fact is that the British custom for names of princes and princesses is that they adopt their titles or their parents’s titles as surnames.

As an example, at school, both Prince Harry and his brother, Prince William, had the titles of William Wales and Harry Wales to reflect their parents’ status of Prince and Princess of Wales.

So, Harry and Meghan have opted to follow tradition by adapting the surnames of their children.

The post Why Harry and Meghan decided to change their children’s names after they were born appeared first on Timeless Life.

Continue Reading


Michael Strahan Discloses Information About His Relationship with Kelly Ripa




Michael Strahan recently opened up about his relationship with Kelly Ripa, his former co-host on “Live! with Kelly and Michael.” The two’s successful partnership ended when Strahan decided to leave the syndicated morning talk show.

Ripa took a week off from the program to process her feelings after she learned about Strahan’s departure. She addressed the situation upon her return, emphasizing the importance of “concentration, communication, and respect in the workplace.”

Though they had past success, including Daytime Emmy wins for “Outstanding Talk Show Host,” their relationship never fully recovered. Strahan admitted, “It had been a long time since he’d spoken to Ripa.” Reflecting on their strained relationship, Strahan remarked, “I realized that you can’t make people like you because of everything that happened to me.”

In the past, Strahan has mentioned the tension that existed between them during their time on the show. However, he also expressed gratitude towards Ripa and executive producer Michael Gelman for their guidance. Strahan explained that it was time for him to move on, noting that “some behind-the-scenes activities had just surfaced” and unresolved issues influenced his decision to leave the show. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

This candid reflection shows the complexities of their professional relationship and the challenges they faced working together.

The post Michael Strahan Discloses Information About His Relationship with Kelly Ripa appeared first on Timeless Life.

Continue Reading


Suri Cruise, the Daughter of Katie and Tom Cruise Silently Changed Her Name




The decision to change her name became apparent during Suri’s involvement in a New York musical production, where she was listed as Suri Noelle, a nod to her mother, Katie Holmes, whose full name includes the middle name Noelle. This deliberate choice reflects Suri’s assertion of her identity and autonomy. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Continue Reading


error: Content is protected !!