Connect with us

METRO

Rich Boy Mocks Girl in Elevator, But Unaware of Who’s standing Behind Him –

Published

on

By

 

Rachel Jackson, a young woman who had just started working in the high-rise corporate world, pressed the button for the 12th floor, excited about the prospects of her new job. The elevator dinged, and she stepped inside, adjusting her blazer nervously. She was determined to make a good impression at this new firm, and the last thing she needed was to attract unwanted attention. But fate had something else in store.

As the elevator doors began to close, a hand shot in and stopped them just before they shut. A tall, well-dressed man stepped in, his confident smirk immediately setting Rachel on edge. He was maybe a few years older than her, wearing an expensive suit that screamed privilege. He took his place beside her, but Rachel noticed the way his eyes lingered a little too long. He pressed the button for the top floor, where the executive suites were, but his focus remained on her…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

“Hey there, new face, huh?” he said, flashing a smile that didn’t reach his eyes.

Rachel offered a polite nod, trying to focus on the elevator’s buttons, willing the doors to open faster. “Yes, I just started in the marketing department.”

The man stepped a little closer, casually leaning against the wall. “Marketing, huh? Well, I hope you know who’s in charge of the whole department now,” his voice was dripping with arrogance.

Rachel wasn’t sure what he was implying. “I’m sorry, I don’t really—”

“It’s me,” he cut her off, his smirk growing wider. “Dylan Carter, son of the CEO. So technically, I run the show now.”

Rachel blinked, caught off guard by his directness. “Well, congratulations,” she said politely, hoping that would end the conversation. But she quickly realized that Dylan wasn’t done.

“So now that we know each other, I’m thinking we could, you know, have a drink sometime, get to know each other a little better.” He leaned in closer, his voice lowering. “It could be good for your career.”

Rachel’s heart raced, but not with excitement; her body screamed discomfort. She’d heard about men like Dylan before—men who thought their wealth and power gave them the right to treat others however they pleased. Trying to remain calm, she shifted away, but the confines of the elevator gave her little space.

“I appreciate the offer,” she said stiffly, “but I’m just focused on my work right now.”

Dylan laughed, a short, mocking sound. “Oh, come on, don’t be like that. You’re not going to make it far in this company being stuck up. You know who my father is, right?”

Rachel felt her skin crawl. The doors still hadn’t opened. She could feel her palms sweating as Dylan moved closer again, his hand brushing her shoulder as he tried to appear casual, but his intent was clear.

“Look, I’m just being nice,” Dylan said, his voice dropping lower. “You’re lucky someone like me is even paying attention to you.”

Rachel wanted to say something, anything, but she felt trapped. Her mind raced for an escape, for any way to get out of this situation. Dylan’s hand brushed her arm again, and Rachel flinched. Then suddenly, the tension was broken by a deep, booming voice from the back of the elevator.

“Hey.”

The voice cut through the air like a knife. Rachel’s eyes darted to the reflection in the elevator’s mirrored walls, and for the first time, she noticed a large man standing behind them. He was older, maybe in his late 40s, with broad shoulders and a hardened expression. He wore a baseball cap, and his stance made it clear that he had been silently observing the entire exchange.

Dylan froze, his hands stopping mid-motion. The man’s piercing gaze was locked onto him, and it was clear he wasn’t about to let Dylan continue.

“You don’t think she looks uncomfortable?” the man said, his tone full of restrained anger.

Dylan blinked, his confidence faltering for the first time. “I-I don’t know what you’re talking about, man. I was just—”

“You were just harassing her,” the man interrupted, stepping closer. “You think just because you’ve got some fancy last name that you can treat people however you want?”

Rachel felt a wave of relief wash over her as the man’s presence grew more intimidating. Dylan, for all his arrogance, took a nervous step back but tried to save face.

“Mind your business, old man. I’m just—” READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

“No.” The man’s voice was steel now. “You’re done.”

The elevator dinged, and the doors opened to reveal the 12th-floor lobby. Rachel was too stunned to move as Dylan quickly pushed past her, muttering something under his breath, his face a mixture of embarrassment and anger. He stalked off without another word.

Rachel finally exhaled, realizing she’d been holding her breath. The large man stayed behind, his presence a comforting shield as he turned toward her. “You okay?” he asked, his voice softer.

Rachel nodded, still shaking. “Thank you. I didn’t know what to do.”

“That guy’s trouble,” the man said. “Seen too many like him. They think they own the world because of who their parents are.” He shook his head, then extended his hand. “I’m Jack, by the way—security.”

Rachel blinked, surprised. “You’re with security?”

Jack smiled. “Not officially. I’m just in town for a meeting with the board. But trust me, I’ve seen enough of guys like Dylan. I wasn’t going to let that happen.”

Rachel couldn’t believe it. “You—you work with the board?”

Jack nodded. “Yeah, in a way. I’m actually the founder of the company’s charity division. Been with the organization for years. When I heard about Dylan being promoted, I figured I’d keep an eye on him. Kids like that don’t learn respect if no one puts them in their place.”

Rachel was still trying to process everything when Jack continued. “You should report him,” Jack said, his tone firm. “Guys like him keep getting away with this stuff because no one speaks up. But you don’t have to handle this alone.”

Rachel hesitated. “I don’t know. He’s the CEO’s son. What if no one believes me?”

Jack crossed his arms. “Let me handle that. I’ve got more influence here than you might think.”

Over the next few days, Rachel worked up the courage to file a formal complaint with Jack’s support. She wasn’t sure what to expect, but she knew that staying silent would only let Dylan continue harassing others. As it turned out, Jack had more sway than she could have imagined. A week later, an internal investigation was launched. With video evidence from the elevator and witness testimonies, Dylan’s behavior was quickly exposed. It wasn’t just Rachel—other women came forward too, sharing their own experiences of Dylan’s inappropriate conduct.

Within days, Dylan was forced to resign, much to his father’s dismay. The CEO, though initially reluctant to act against his son, had no choice but to face the mounting pressure from within the company and the public eye. The board couldn’t afford to keep someone like Dylan in a position of power, no matter his family connections.

Rachel, meanwhile, received an unexpected promotion. The company’s leadership recognized her courage in speaking out, and with Jack’s recommendation, she was given the opportunity to take on more responsibility within the marketing department. But more importantly, Rachel realized something vital: standing up against people like Dylan wasn’t just about seeking justice for herself. It was about protecting others who might have been victimized and showing that no matter how powerful someone seemed, they could always be held accountable.

As for Jack, he remained a quiet guardian within the company, always watching, always ready to step in when needed. He never sought recognition for his actions, but Rachel knew that without him, things could have turned out very differently.

In the end, it wasn’t Dylan’s wealth or his father’s influence that defined the company’s culture—it was the courage of ordinary people like Rachel and the unexpected kindness of someone like Jack, who stood up when it mattered most.

This story teaches us the importance of standing up against harassment and abuse of power, regardless of a person’s social status or influence. Rachel was put in a situation where Dylan, a privileged and entitled man, used his position to intimidate and manipulate her in the confines of an elevator. However, it also shows that one doesn’t have to face these situations alone. Jack’s intervention was crucial in stopping the harassment, demonstrating that bystanders play a critical role in preventing abuse and standing up for what’s right.

Dylan’s behavior was driven by arrogance and a false sense of security due to his wealth and connections. Yet the story highlights that no one is untouchable when people work together to call out injustice. Rachel’s courage to file a complaint, supported by Jack’s influence, proved that individuals, no matter their position, can hold even the most powerful people accountable. The eventual outcome—Dylan’s forced resignation—proves that privilege does not protect someone from consequences when they misuse their power.

This story also underscores the importance of solidarity in the workplace and having a culture where people feel safe to speak up. It reminds us that fighting back against harassment doesn’t just benefit the victim but helps create a safer environment for everyone.

Have you ever witnessed a situation where someone stood up against harassment or an abuse of power? What impact did it have on the situation, and how did it change your perspective on stepping in? Let us know in the comments below.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

METRO

Guy Fawkes’ punishment was one of the most severe in English history – here’s what happens when a body is hung, drawn and quartered

Published

on

By

Fawkes and his co-conspirators were sentenced to hanging, drawing and quartering. Crispijn van de Passe the Elder/ Wikimedia Commons

After their infamous plot to destroy parliament was foiled, Guy Fawkes and his co-conspirators received one of the most severe judicial sentences in English history: hanging, drawing and quartering. According to the Treason Act 1351 , this punishment involved…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

Author

  • Michelle SpearProfessor of Anatomy, University of Bristol

That you be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution, where you shall be hanged by the neck and being alive cut down, your privy members shall be cut off and your bowels taken out and burned before you, your head severed from your body and your body divided into four quarters to be disposed of at the King’s pleasure.

This process aimed not only to inflict excruciating pain on the condemned, but to serve as a deterrent – demonstrating the fate of those who betrayed the Crown. While Fawkes reportedly jumped from the gallows – which meant he avoided the full extent of his punishment – his co-conspirators apparently weren’t so lucky.

By dissecting each stage of this medieval punishment from an anatomical perspective, we can understand the profound agony each of them endured.

Torture for confession

Before his public execution on January 31 1606, Fawkes was tortured to force a confession about his involvement in the “gunpowder plot”.

The Tower of London records confirm that King James I personally authorised “the gentler tortures first”. Accounts reveal that Fawkes was stretched on the rack – a device designed to slowly pull the limbs in opposite directions. This stretching inflicted severe trauma on the shoulders, elbows and hips, as well as the spine.

The forces exerted by the rack probably exceeded those required for joint or hip dislocation under normal conditions.

Substantive differences between Fawkes’ signatures on confessions between November 8 and shortly before his execution may indicate the amount of nerve and soft tissue damage sustained. It also illustrates how remarkable his final leap from the gallows was.

An engraving depicting a person being tortured on the rack.
The rack slowly pulled a prisoner’s limbs in opposite directions. Wellcome Collection/ Wikimedia Commons , CC BY-SA

Stage 1: hanging (partial strangulation)

After surviving the torture of the rack, Fawkes and his gang faced the next stage of their punishment: hanging. But this form of hanging only partially strangled the condemned – preserving their consciousness and prolonging their suffering.

Partial strangulation exerts extreme pressure on several critical neck structures. The hyoid bone , a small u-shaped structure above the larynx, is prone to bruising or fracture under compression .

Simultaneously, pressure on the carotid arteries restricts blood flow to the brain, while compression of the jugular veins causes pooling of blood in the head – probably resulting in visible haemorrhages in the eyes and face.

Because the larynx and trachea (both essential for airflow) are partially obstructed, this makes breathing laboured. Strain on the cervical spine and surrounding muscles in the neck can lead to tearing, muscle spasms or dislocation of the vertebra – causing severe pain. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

Fawkes brought his agony to a premature end by leaping from the gallows. Accounts from the time tell us:

His body being weak with the torture and sickness, he was scarce able to go up the ladder – yet with much ado, by the help of the hangman, went high enough to break his neck by the fall.

This probably caused him to suffer a bilateral fracture of his second cervical vertebra, assisted by his own bodyweight – an injury known as the “hangman’s fracture” .

Stage 2: Drawing (disembowelment)

After enduring partial hanging, the victim would then be “drawn” – a process which involved disembowelling them while still alive. This act mainly targeted the organs of the abdominal cavity – including the intestines, liver and kidney, as well as major blood vessels such as the abdominal aorta.

The physiological response to disembowelment would have been immediate and severe. The abdominal cavity possesses a high concentration of pain receptors – particularly around the membranous lining of the abdomen . When punctured, these pain receptors would have sent intense pain signals to the brain, overwhelming the body’s capacity for pain management . Shock would soon follow due to the rapid drop in blood pressure caused by massive amounts of blood loss.

Stage 3: quartering (dismemberment)

Quartering was also supposed to be performed while the victim was still alive. Though no accounts exist detailing at what phase victims typically lost consciousness during execution, it’s highly unlikely many survived the shock of being drawn.

So, at this stage, publicity superseded punishment given the victim’s likely earlier demise. Limbs that were removed from criminals were preserved by boiling them with spices. These were then toured around the country to act as a deterrent for others.

Though accounts suggest Fawkes’s body parts were sent to “the four corners of the United Kingdom”, there is no specific record of what was sent where. However, his head was displayed in London .

Traitor’s punishment

The punishment of hanging, drawing and quartering was designed to be as anatomically devastating as it was psychologically terrifying. Each stage of the process exploited the vulnerabilities of the human body to create maximum pain and suffering, while also serving as a grim reminder of the consequences of treason.

This punishment also gives us an insight into how medieval justice systems used the body as a canvas for social and political messaging. Fawkes’s fate, though unimaginable today, exemplifies the extremes to which the state could, and would, go to maintain control, power and authority over its subjects.

The sentence of hanging, drawing and quartering was officially removed from English law as part of the Forfeiture Act of 1870 .

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

OPINION: 4 Children Who Were Sentenced to life imprisonment At A Young Age And what They Did

Published

on

By

There are many unusual things happening across the world. Children are charming and lovely, yet others are really dangerous and have been involved in a variety of illegal activities in society.

In this post, we’ll look at four children who were condemned to life in jail Please keep in mind that some of these children are now adults…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

1. Joshua Phillips:

Joshua Phillips stabbed his neighbor’s eight-year-old daughter and put the girl’s body under his bed at home. After eight days, his mother discovered the body.

Joshua Phillips was fourteen years old when he committed this act, according to reports, and he was sentenced to life in jail.

Take a look at how Joshua Phillips is now.

2. Eric Smith:

Eric Smith, according to sources, was condemned to life in jail many years ago. Eric Smith was just 13 years old when he hit a 4-year-old boy with a rock and killed him.

Following multiple conversations with Eric, he stated that he was bullied by several senior kids at his school and that he killed the youngster because he was irritated and upset. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

3. Lionel Tate:

Lionel Tate was one of the youngest people to get a life sentence.

According to sources, when he was 13 years old, Lionel Tate killed his neighbor’s six-year-old daughter.

Lionel Tate claimed he was boxing with the young girl.

4. Brian Lee Draper:

Brian Lee Draper was sentenced to life in prison in 2006 for murdering a classmate, according to reports.

The murder was committed by Brian Lee Draper and his friend Torey Adamcik, who was sixteen years old at the time.

Parents should always endeavor to teach their children how to be good children, as well as pray for them.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

METRO

Lady Caught Feeding Neighbor’s Baby With Faeces & Urine Speaks From Prison, Gives This Ugly Reason

Published

on

By

A woman named Stella Namwanje was arrested in Uganda for allegedly committing an atrocious act against her neighbor’s baby. Reports indicate that she was caught on video defecating and urinating on the infant before feeding him the waste. This shocking behavior has drawn widespread condemnation and raised serious concerns about the child’s welfare…Click Here To Continue Reading>> …Click Here To Continue Reading>>

 

The incident took place in the Binyonyi A area of the Nyendo-Mukungwe division. Local authorities acted swiftly after the disturbing footage circulated on social media, prompting community outrage. The police have since taken Namwanje into custody to investigate the circumstances surrounding her actions and ensure the safety of the child.

The case has sparked discussions about the need for stronger measures to protect vulnerable individuals, especially children, from abuse. It highlights the alarming reality of child torture and the psychological issues that may drive such behavior. READ FULL STORY HERE>>>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>

As the investigation unfolds, the community is rallying to support the affected family and prevent similar incidents in the future. The legal proceedings against Namwanje will likely focus on the extent of her actions and the necessary repercussions for such a heinous crime.

 

READ FULL STORY HERE>>...CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING>>>
Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!